Case: 20260502T131206Z__gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de
PASS Trajectory: recovered | Invoked: yes | Match: 100%
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-warmup --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260502T131206Z/cases/gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/workspace-warmup --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/cryptidbleh/gemma4-claude-opus-4.6:latest 'Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt. Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL. Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE. '
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-measured --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260502T131206Z/cases/gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/workspace --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/cryptidbleh/gemma4-claude-opus-4.6:latest 'Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt. Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL. Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE. '
Consistency: diverged
Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt. Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL. Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
2026-05-02
2026-05-02
Expected and observed match.
No structured session transcript found.
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-02T13:16:34+00:00
[13:16:35] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260502T131206Z/cases/gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/runtime/gptme/warmup/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[13:16:36] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
[13:16:36] Using model: local/cryptidbleh/gemma4-claude-opus-4.6:latest
Using logdir:
/work/results/runs/20260502T131206Z/cases/gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/runtime/gptme/warmup/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-warmup
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260502T131206Z/cases/gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/workspace-warmup
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt.
Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht.
Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL.
Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to execute a specific shell command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`.
I need to use the `shell` tool for this.
If the command succeeds, I should respond with "DONE".
If the command fails, I should respond with "FAIL".
Step 1: Execute the command using the `shell` tool.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_yiannibe): {"command":"date +%F \u003e date-output.txt"}
Preview
date +%F > date-output.txt
System:
Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`
No output
Assistant: Thinking...
[13:16:43] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
[13:16:49] INFO Reasoning content: Thinking Process: llm_openai.py:321
1. **Analyze the Request:** The user wants me to create a concise, 2-4 word title for the provided conversation.
2. **Analyze the Conversation Content:**
* User instruction: "Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt. Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL. Wenn der Befehl..." (Use
the Shell Tool. Execute this command exactly: date +%F > date-output.txt. Do not repeat the process on error. If the command fails, only reply with FAIL. If the command...)
* Assistant response (implied context): The assistant is setting up a command execution task, focusing on shell commands and error handling.
3. **Identify the Main Topic:** The core topic is executing shell commands and error handling/tool usage.
4. **Draft Potential Titles (2-4 words):**
* Shell command execution
* Shell tool usage
* Command execution rules
* Shell command handling
5. **Select the Best/Most Concise Title:** "Shell command execution" or something similar captures the essence.
6. **Final Output Generation:** (Ensure only the title is outputted.)
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
DONE
INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[13:16:49] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user has provided a message indicating that no tool call was detected in the last message and suggesting I might want to use the `complete` tool.
However, the previous turn was a direct instruction to execute a shell command and report success/failure. I have already executed that command and reported "DONE".
Since there is no new task or explicit request, and the previous task is complete, I should consider if the session should end. The instruction set for the `complete` tool is: "Use this tool to signal that you have completed your work and the autonomous session should end. Make sure you have actually completely finished before calling this tool."
Since the immediate task is finished, I will use the `complete` tool to signal the end of the session.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_rsy56dt4): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[13:16:53] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[13:16:53] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-warmup)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-02T13:16:53+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-02T13:16:34+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-02T13:16:53+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-02T13:16:53+00:00
[13:16:55] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260502T131206Z/cases/gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/runtime/gptme/measured/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[13:16:55] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/cryptidbleh/gemma4-claude-opus-4.6:latest
Using logdir:
/work/results/runs/20260502T131206Z/cases/gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/runtime/gptme/measured/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-measured
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260502T131206Z/cases/gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/workspace
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt.
Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht.
Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL.
Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to execute a specific shell command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`.
I need to use the `shell` tool for this.
If the command fails, I must respond only with "FAIL".
If the command succeeds, I must respond only with "DONE".
Plan:
1. Call the `shell` tool with the command `date +%F > date-output.txt`.
2. Analyze the output to determine success or failure.
3. Respond accordingly.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_fixkcuyl): {"command":"date +%F \u003e date-output.txt"}
Preview
date +%F > date-output.txt
System:
Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`
No output
Assistant: Thinking...
[13:17:03] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
[13:17:08] INFO Reasoning content: Thinking Process: llm_openai.py:321
1. **Analyze the Request:** The user wants me to create a concise, 2-4 word title for the provided conversation.
2. **Analyze the Conversation Content:**
* User instruction: "Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt. Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL. Wenn der Befehl..."
* Assistant response (internal thought): The assistant is setting up rules for executing a shell command and handling errors.
3. **Identify the Main Topic:** The core topic is executing shell commands and error handling.
4. **Draft Potential Titles (Focusing on conciseness):**
* Shell command execution
* Shell command rules
* Shell error handling
* Executing shell commands
5. **Select the Best Fit (2-4 words):** "Shell command execution" or "Shell command rules" are accurate. "Shell command execution" is slightly more descriptive of the action.
6. **Final Output Generation:** Shell command execution.
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
DONE
[13:17:09] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[13:17:09] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user has provided a message indicating that no tool call was detected and suggesting I might want to finish.
Since the previous request was a direct instruction to execute a command and report success/failure, and I have already executed it and reported "DONE", I should now consider if the task is complete.
The previous instruction was: "Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt. Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL. Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE."
I have already executed the command and responded with "DONE". There are no further instructions in this turn. I will assume the task is complete.
I will use the `complete` tool to signal the end of the session.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_pjy090du): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[13:17:13] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[13:17:13] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_cryptidbleh_gemma4_claude_opus_4_6_latest__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-measured)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-02T13:17:13+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-02T13:16:53+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-02T13:17:13+00:00 exit_code=0
# Modelfile generated by "ollama show"
# To build a new Modelfile based on this, replace FROM with:
# FROM cryptidbleh/gemma4-claude-opus-4.6:latest
FROM /usr/share/ollama/.ollama/models/blobs/sha256-5eda4e4d50e51a341a55b589273be150639cc5684a3472db0e4699fb0f5a3820
TEMPLATE {{ .Prompt }}
SYSTEM "
you are gemma4 e2b (2 billion effective parameters), distilled from Claude Opus 4.6.
You are a master software engineer. When coding provide concise, production-ready code.
"
RENDERER gemma4
PARSER gemma4
PARAMETER num_batch 2048
PARAMETER num_ctx 131072
PARAMETER num_gpu 99
PARAMETER stop <turn|>