Case: 20260502T121327Z__gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple
PASS Trajectory: recovered | Invoked: yes | Match: 100%
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple-warmup --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260502T121327Z/cases/gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple/workspace-warmup --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/fredrezones55/qwen3.5-opus:9b 'Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c '"'"'from pathlib import Path; Path("python-output.txt").write_text("PYTHON_OK\n")'"'"'.
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
'gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple-measured --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260502T121327Z/cases/gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple/workspace --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/fredrezones55/qwen3.5-opus:9b 'Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c '"'"'from pathlib import Path; Path("python-output.txt").write_text("PYTHON_OK\n")'"'"'.
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
'Consistency: diverged
Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path("python-output.txt").write_text("PYTHON_OK\n")'.
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
PYTHON_OK
PYTHON_OK
Expected and observed match.
No structured session transcript found.
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-02T12:14:27+00:00
[12:14:29] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260502T121327Z/cases/gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple/runtime/gptme/warmup/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[12:14:29] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/fredrezones55/qwen3.5-opus:9b
[12:14:30] Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260502T121327Z/cases/gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple/runtime/gptme/warmup/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple-warmup
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260502T121327Z/cases/gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple/workspace-warmup
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path("python-output.txt").write_text("PYTHON_OK\n")'.
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to run a specific Python command that creates a file called "python-output.txt" with the content "PYTHON_OK[/dim]n". This is a straightforward command that should succeed.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_gso28voq): {"command":"python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path(\"python-output.txt\").write_text(\"PYTHON_OK\\n\")'"}
Preview
python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path("python-output.txt").write_text("PYTHON_OK\n")'
System:
Ran command: `python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path("python-output.txt").write_text("PYTHON_OK\n")'`
No output
[12:14:42] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The command ran without any output, which is expected since it's just writing a file. Let me verify the file was created correctly.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_zes3huvr): {"command":"cat python-output.txt"}
PYTHON_OK
System:
Ran allowlisted command: `cat python-output.txt`
`PYTHON_OK`
Assistant: Thinking...
[12:14:52] INFO Reasoning content: The user wants me to run a specific Python command that creates a file called "python-output.txt" with the content "PYTHON_OK\n". This is a straightforward command that should succeed. llm_openai.py:321
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Title: Python file creation chat.py:332
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The file was created successfully with the correct content "PYTHON_OK". The command succeeded.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[12:14:55] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[12:14:55] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user asked me to run a specific Python command to create a file, and I successfully did so. The file was created and contains "PYTHON_OK[/dim]n" as expected. The task is complete.
However, I notice the system is asking me to use the `complete` tool to end the session. But the user's original instruction was to reply with "DONE" if the command succeeds, which I did.
Let me re-read the instructions:
- If the command fails, reply only with FAIL
- If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE
I did reply with DONE. The session is now complete. I should use the complete tool to signal that my work is done.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_fsct1tpm): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[12:15:09] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[12:15:09] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple-warmup)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-02T12:15:09+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-02T12:14:27+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-02T12:15:09+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-02T12:15:09+00:00
[12:15:11] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260502T121327Z/cases/gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple/runtime/gptme/measured/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[12:15:11] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/fredrezones55/qwen3.5-opus:9b
[12:15:12] Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260502T121327Z/cases/gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple/runtime/gptme/measured/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple-measured
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260502T121327Z/cases/gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple/workspace
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path("python-output.txt").write_text("PYTHON_OK\n")'.
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to run a specific Python command that creates a file called "python-output.txt" with the content "PYTHON_OK[/dim]n". This is a straightforward command that should succeed.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_sjk85hip): {"command":"python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path(\"python-output.txt\").write_text(\"PYTHON_OK\\n\")'"}
Preview
python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path("python-output.txt").write_text("PYTHON_OK\n")'
System:
Ran command: `python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path("python-output.txt").write_text("PYTHON_OK\n")'`
No output
Assistant: Thinking...
[12:15:24] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
[12:15:28] INFO Reasoning content: The user wants me to run a specific Python command that creates a file called "python-output.txt" with the content "PYTHON_OK\n". This is a straightforward command that should succeed. llm_openai.py:321
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Title: Python file creation chat.py:332
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The command ran without any output, which is expected since it's just writing a file. Let me verify the file was created correctly.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_2dh680jl): {"command":"cat python-output.txt"}
PYTHON_OK
System:
Ran allowlisted command: `cat python-output.txt`
`PYTHON_OK`
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The file was created successfully with the correct content "PYTHON_OK". The command succeeded.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[12:15:38] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[12:15:38] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user asked me to run a specific Python command to create a file, and I successfully did so. The file was created and contains "PYTHON_OK[/dim]n" as expected. The task is complete.
However, I notice the system is asking me to use the `complete` tool to end the session. But the user's original instruction was to reply with "DONE" if the command succeeds, which I did.
Let me re-read the instructions:
- If the command fails, reply only with FAIL
- If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE
I did reply with DONE. The session is now complete. I should use the complete tool to signal that my work is done.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_udfejcfr): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[12:15:51] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[12:15:51] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_fredrezones55_qwen3_5_opus_9b__ollama__tool__python_file_simple-measured)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-02T12:15:52+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-02T12:15:09+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-02T12:15:52+00:00 exit_code=0
# Modelfile generated by "ollama show"
# To build a new Modelfile based on this, replace FROM with:
# FROM fredrezones55/qwen3.5-opus:9b
FROM /usr/share/ollama/.ollama/models/blobs/sha256-8fdd528f196fb407770de35b3ff38fdff5fd185925f3302bf71a7cb6d4b311cb
TEMPLATE {{ .Prompt }}
RENDERER qwen3.5
PARSER qwen3.5
PARAMETER repeat_penalty 1
PARAMETER temperature 1
PARAMETER top_k 20
PARAMETER top_p 0.95
PARAMETER num_predict 32768
PARAMETER presence_penalty 1.5