Case: 20260501T144517Z__gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file
PASS Trajectory: recovered | Invoked: yes | Match: 100%
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file-warmup --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260501T144517Z/cases/gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file/workspace-warmup --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/aravhawk/qwen3.5-opus-4.6-text:9b 'Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: printf '"'"'SHELL_OK\n'"'"' > shell-output.txt. Do not retry on error. If the command fails, reply only with FAIL. If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE. '
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file-measured --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260501T144517Z/cases/gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file/workspace --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/aravhawk/qwen3.5-opus-4.6-text:9b 'Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: printf '"'"'SHELL_OK\n'"'"' > shell-output.txt. Do not retry on error. If the command fails, reply only with FAIL. If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE. '
Consistency: diverged
Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: printf 'SHELL_OK\n' > shell-output.txt. Do not retry on error. If the command fails, reply only with FAIL. If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
SHELL_OK
SHELL_OK
Expected and observed match.
No structured session transcript found.
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-01T15:00:22+00:00
[15:00:24] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260501T144517Z/cases/gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file/runtime/gptme/warmup/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[15:00:24] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/aravhawk/qwen3.5-opus-4.6-text:9b
Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260501T144517Z/cases/gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file/runtime/gptme/warmup/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file-warmup
[15:00:25] Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260501T144517Z/cases/gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file/workspace-warmup
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: printf 'SHELL_OK\n' > shell-output.txt.
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to run a specific shell command and report the result. This is a straightforward command execution task.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_2kzfn3lk): {"command":"printf 'SHELL_OK\\n' \u003e shell-output.txt"}
Preview
printf 'SHELL_OK\n' > shell-output.txt
System:
Ran command: `printf 'SHELL_OK\n' > shell-output.txt`
No output
Assistant: Thinking...
[15:00:35] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
[15:00:45] INFO Reasoning content: Let me analyze this conversation to create an appropriate 2-4 word title. llm_openai.py:321
The conversation involves:
1. User requesting a shell command execution
2. Assistant executing the command `printf 'SHELL_OK\n' > shell-output.txt`
3. Assistant reporting the result
The main topic is shell command execution and verification.
Possible titles:
- "Shell command execution"
- "Command verification"
- "Shell output test"
- "Command run result"
"Shell command execution" best captures the essence - it's about running a shell command and verifying it worked.
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The command executed successfully with no output, which is expected for a redirect operation. Let me verify the file was created correctly.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_vof7i1x6): {"command":"cat shell-output.txt"}
SHELL_OK
System:
Ran allowlisted command: `cat shell-output.txt`
`SHELL_OK`
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The file was created successfully and contains the expected content "SHELL_OK". The command executed without errors.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[15:00:55] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[15:00:55] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user asked me to run a specific command to create a file with "SHELL_OK[/dim]n" content. I successfully executed the command and verified the output by reading the file back with cat, which showed "SHELL_OK" as expected.
The task was simple and has been completed successfully. The user's instructions were clear:
1. Run the exact command: printf 'SHELL_OK[/dim]n' > shell-output.txt
2. Reply with FAIL if it fails, DONE if it succeeds
I have done both - the command succeeded and I replied with DONE.
Now the system is prompting me to use the complete tool to end the session. Since the task was simple and has been completed, I should use the complete tool.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_pramae2z): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[15:01:09] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[15:01:09] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file-warmup)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-01T15:01:09+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-01T15:00:22+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-01T15:01:09+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-01T15:01:09+00:00
[15:01:11] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260501T144517Z/cases/gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file/runtime/gptme/measured/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[15:01:11] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/aravhawk/qwen3.5-opus-4.6-text:9b
Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260501T144517Z/cases/gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file/runtime/gptme/measured/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file-measured
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260501T144517Z/cases/gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file/workspace
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: printf 'SHELL_OK\n' > shell-output.txt.
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to run a specific shell command and report the result. This is a straightforward command execution task.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_gt73view): {"command":"printf 'SHELL_OK\\n' \u003e shell-output.txt"}
Preview
printf 'SHELL_OK\n' > shell-output.txt
System:
Ran command: `printf 'SHELL_OK\n' > shell-output.txt`
No output
[15:01:22] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant: Thinking...
[15:01:32] INFO Reasoning content: Let me analyze this conversation: llm_openai.py:321
1. The user is asking me to run a specific shell command: `printf 'SHELL_OK\n' > shell-output.txt`
2. The user has clear instructions:
- Use the shell tool
- Run exactly the specified command
- Do not retry on error
- Reply with FAIL if it fails
- Reply with DONE if it succeeds
3. The assistant needs to execute this command and report the result
This is a simple command execution task with clear success/failure criteria.
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Title: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The command executed successfully with no output, which is expected for a redirect operation. Let me verify the file was created correctly.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_2cc36tyt): {"command":"cat shell-output.txt"}
SHELL_OK
System:
Ran allowlisted command: `cat shell-output.txt`
`SHELL_OK`
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The file was created successfully and contains the expected content "SHELL_OK". The command executed without errors.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[15:01:41] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[15:01:41] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user asked me to run a specific command to create a file with "SHELL_OK[/dim]n" content. I successfully executed the command and verified the output by reading the file back with cat, which showed "SHELL_OK" as expected.
The task was simple and has been completed successfully. The user's instructions were clear:
1. Run the exact command: printf 'SHELL_OK[/dim]n' > shell-output.txt
2. Reply with FAIL if it fails, DONE if it succeeds
I have done both - the command succeeded and I replied with DONE.
Now the system is prompting me to use the complete tool to end the session. Since the task was simple and has been completed, I should use the complete tool.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_06370pog): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[15:01:55] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[15:01:55] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_aravhawk_qwen3_5_opus_4_6_text_9b__ollama__tool__shell_file-measured)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-01T15:01:55+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-05-01T15:01:09+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-05-01T15:01:55+00:00 exit_code=0
# Modelfile generated by "ollama show"
# To build a new Modelfile based on this, replace FROM with:
# FROM aravhawk/qwen3.5-opus-4.6-text:9b
FROM /usr/share/ollama/.ollama/models/blobs/sha256-d0ecd80b0e45b0d9e49c8cd1527b7f7d52d8d3bde2c569ab36aac59bb78f53f7
TEMPLATE {{ .Prompt }}
RENDERER qwen3.5
PARSER qwen3.5
PARAMETER num_ctx 32768
PARAMETER presence_penalty 1.5
PARAMETER stop <|im_end|>
PARAMETER stop <|im_start|>
PARAMETER temperature 1
PARAMETER top_k 20
PARAMETER top_p 0.95