Case: 20260423T190703Z__gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru
PASS Trajectory: recovered | Invoked: yes | Match: 100%
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-warmup --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/workspace-warmup --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/qwen3:8b 'Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt. Не повторяй попытку при ошибке. Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL. Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE. '
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-measured --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/workspace --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/qwen3:8b 'Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt. Не повторяй попытку при ошибке. Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL. Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE. '
Consistency: diverged
Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt. Не повторяй попытку при ошибке. Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL. Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
2026-04-23
2026-04-23
Expected and observed match.
No structured session transcript found.
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T19:19:05+00:00
[19:19:07] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/runtime/gptme/warmup/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[19:19:07] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/qwen3:8b
Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/runtime/gptme/warmup/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-warmup
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/workspace-warmup
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt.
Не повторяй попытку при ошибке.
Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL.
Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, I need to use the shell tool to execute the command 'date +%F > date-output.txt'. Let me make sure I understand what this command does. The 'date' command with the format '%F' will output the current date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Then, the output is redirected to a file named date-output.txt.
First, I should check if the shell tool is available. According to the tools provided, the shell function is there, and it can execute commands. The user specified to not retry if there's an error, so I need to run this command once and then check the result.
I should construct the tool call with the shell function and the command as the argument. The command is straightforward, so there's no need for background jobs here since it's a simple redirection.
Wait, the user mentioned that if the command fails, I should respond with FAIL, and if successful, DONE. So after executing the command, I need to capture the output or check the exit status. However, the shell tool's response will include the output, so if there's an error, the output will indicate that. For example, if the file can't be written, the output might show an error message.
But the user wants me to execute exactly that command without any modifications. So I'll proceed to call the shell function with the given command. Let me make sure the command is correctly formatted. The command is 'date +%F > date-output.txt', which is a single line.
I should structure the tool call correctly. The function is 'shell', and the arguments should be the command as a string. So the JSON object should have the name as 'shell' and the arguments with the command.
Once the command is executed, the response will tell me if it succeeded or failed. If the file is created successfully, the output will be the date, and the status will be success. If there's an error, like permission denied, the output will show the error, and I should respond with FAIL.
Since the user specified to not repeat the attempt on error, I need to execute this once. Therefore, the correct action is to call the shell function with the exact command.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_94ir47q7): {"command":"date +%F \u003e date-output.txt"}
Preview
date +%F > date-output.txt
System:
Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`
No output
[19:19:22] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant: Thinking...
[19:19:38] INFO Reasoning content: Okay, the user wants a concise title for a conversation where they're using a shell command to write the current date to a file. The example titles are things like "Python debugging help" or "CSS layout issue". So I llm_openai.py:321
need to capture the main topic in 2-4 words.
The key elements here are the shell tool, the command execution, and the specific action of writing the date to a file. The user mentioned using the shell tool and executing exactly that command. The title should reflect that it's about
running a shell command, specifically the date command, and maybe the output file. But since the examples are more about the task or problem, like "Website creation task" or "API integration guide", maybe I should focus on the action.
The command is to run 'date +%F > date-output.txt'. The main topic here is executing that command via the shell. So possible titles could be "Shell command execution" or "Date command output". But maybe shorter. Let me think. The user is
using the shell tool to run the command, so maybe "Shell command task" or "Run date command". But the examples have things like "Python debugging help" which is more about the problem. Alternatively, since the user is instructing the
assistant to perform the command, maybe "Execute date command" or "Shell command run".
Wait, the user's message is about using the shell tool to run that exact command. The title needs to capture that. Maybe "Shell command execution" is too long. Let me check the word limit. The examples have up to 4 words. So "Shell
command task" is 3 words. Alternatively, "Date command output" is 3 words. But the user's main action is executing the command, so maybe "Execute date command" is better. But the examples have "Website creation task" which is similar.
Alternatively, "Shell command run" is 2 words. But maybe the key is that the command is to write the date to a file. However, the title should be concise.
Another angle: the user is using the shell tool to perform the command, so maybe "Shell command task" or "Run date command". The examples include "API integration guide", which is about the task. So perhaps "Shell command task" is
appropriate. Alternatively, since the command is specific, maybe "Date command output" or "Date command run". But the user's main point is to execute the command via the shell. So "Shell command execution" is 3 words. Alternatively, "Run
date command" is 2 words. That might be better. Let me check the examples again. The examples have "Python debugging help" which is 3 words. So "Run date command" fits within the 4-word limit. Alternatively, "Shell command run" is 2
words. But maybe the main topic is the command itself. The user is asking to run the date command, so "Date command run" or "Run date command". Either way, both are 2-3 words. I think "Run date command" is concise and captures the main
action. Alternatively, "Shell command task" if the focus is on the tool. But the command is specific, so "Run date command" might be better. Let me go with that.
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Run date command chat.py:332
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me process this. The user asked to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt` using the shell tool. The response from the tool says "Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`" and "No output".
First, I need to determine if the command was successful. The command redirects the output of the date command to a file. If there's no output shown, it might mean that the command executed without errors, and the output was successfully written to the file. However, sometimes if there's an error, like permission issues, the command might fail, but the user specified to not retry.
Wait, the user mentioned that if the command fails, I should respond with FAIL, else DONE. Since the tool's response says "No output", but the command itself might have succeeded. For example, if the file was created successfully, the shell might not show any output. However, sometimes the shell might show an error if the redirection failed. But in this case, the user's tool response doesn't show any error message.
Alternatively, maybe the command ran successfully, and the output was written to the file. The user's instruction was to execute exactly that command, and since there's no error message, it's likely successful. Therefore, the correct response is DONE.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[19:19:48] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[19:19:48] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me see. The user asked to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt` using the shell tool. I called the shell function with that command. The response from the tool said the command ran with no output. Since the command is straightforward and doesn't produce any output by default, the absence of output might just mean it worked silently. The user also mentioned that if there's an error, I should reply with FAIL, else DONE. Since there's no error message, and the command is simple, it's likely successful. So I should respond with DONE. The system message mentioned using the complete tool if done, but the user's last instruction was to answer only with DONE or FAIL. So I'll stick with DONE.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[19:19:52] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[19:19:52] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me see. The user initially asked to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt` using the shell tool. I called the shell function with that command. The response indicated that the command ran without output, and the user then replied with "DONE".
But then the system message mentioned that no tool call was detected in the last message, suggesting to use the `complete` tool if done. The user tried replying with "DONE" again, but the system is prompting again.
Wait, maybe the user is trying to signal completion. Since the command was executed successfully, and the user has already confirmed with "DONE", the next step should be to use the `complete` tool to end the session. The system is probably expecting that instead of just "DONE".
So, I should call the `complete` function now to properly finish the session. That makes sense because the user has already handled the command, and the system is reminding to use `complete` when done.
</think>
</think>
[19:19:58] INFO Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 confirmations. Exiting. complete.py:134
INFO Hook 'complete.auto_reply' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[19:19:58] Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 auto-reply confirmations. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-warmup)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T19:19:58+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T19:19:05+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T19:19:58+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T19:19:58+00:00
[19:19:59] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/runtime/gptme/measured/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[19:19:59] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/qwen3:8b
[19:20:00] Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/runtime/gptme/measured/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-measured
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/workspace
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt.
Не повторяй попытку при ошибке.
Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL.
Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, I need to use the shell tool to execute the command 'date +%F > date-output.txt'. Let me make sure I understand what this command does. The 'date' command with the format '%F' will output the current date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Then, the output is redirected to a file named date-output.txt.
First, I should check if the shell tool is available. According to the tools provided, the shell function is there, so I can use it. The user specified to execute exactly this command and not repeat if there's an error. Also, if there's an error, I should respond with FAIL, and if successful, DONE.
I need to construct the tool call correctly. The function is 'shell', and the argument is the command as a string. The command is 'date +%F > date-output.txt'. I should make sure there are no typos in the command. The redirection operator '>' will create the file if it doesn't exist or overwrite it if it does.
Since the user mentioned not to attempt again on error, I should execute this command once. There's no need for background jobs here because the command is simple and won't run indefinitely.
I'll proceed to call the shell function with the specified command. If the command runs successfully, the response will be DONE. If there's an error, like permission issues or the command not being recognized, the response will be FAIL. But based on standard Unix systems, the 'date' command is usually available, so success is likely. However, I need to follow the user's instruction to respond accordingly based on the outcome.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_s8jg5a3s): {"command":"date +%F \u003e date-output.txt"}
Preview
date +%F > date-output.txt
System:
Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`
No output
[19:20:13] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant: Thinking...
[19:20:28] INFO Reasoning content: Okay, the user wants a concise title for a conversation where they're using a shell command to write the current date to a file. The example titles are things like "Python debugging help" or "CSS layout issue". So I llm_openai.py:321
need to capture the main topic in 2-4 words.
The key elements here are the shell tool, the command execution, and the specific action of writing the date to a file. The user mentioned using the shell tool and executing exactly that command. The title should reflect that it's about
running a shell command, specifically the date command, and maybe the output file. But since the examples are more about the task or problem, like "Website creation task" or "API integration guide", maybe I should focus on the action.
The command is to run 'date +%F > date-output.txt'. The main topic here is executing that command via the shell. So possible titles could be "Shell command execution" or "Date command output". But maybe shorter. Let me think. The user is
using the shell tool to run the command, so maybe "Shell command task" or "Run date command". But the examples have things like "Python debugging help" which is more about the problem. Alternatively, since the user is instructing the
assistant to perform the command, maybe "Execute date command" or "Shell command run".
Wait, the user's message is about using the shell tool to run that exact command. The title needs to capture that. Maybe "Shell command execution" is too long. Let me check the word limit. The examples have up to 4 words. So "Shell
command task" is 3 words. Alternatively, "Date command output" is 3 words. But the user's main action is executing the command, so maybe "Execute date command" is better. But the examples have "Website creation task" which is similar.
Alternatively, "Shell command run" is 2 words. But maybe the key is that the command is to write the date to a file. However, the title should be concise.
Another angle: the user is using the shell tool to perform the command, so maybe "Shell command task" or "Run date command". The examples include "API integration guide", which is about the task. So perhaps "Shell command task" is
appropriate. Alternatively, since the command is specific, maybe "Date command output" or "Date command run". But the user's main point is to execute the command via the shell. So "Shell command execution" is 3 words. Alternatively, "Run
date command" is 2 words. That might be better. Let me check the examples again. The examples have "Python debugging help" which is 3 words. So "Run date command" fits within the 4-word limit. Alternatively, "Shell command run" is 2
words. But maybe the main topic is the command itself. The user is asking to run the date command, so "Date command run" or "Run date command". Either way, both are 2-3 words. I think "Run date command" is concise and captures the main
action. Alternatively, "Shell command task" if the focus is on the tool. But the command is specific, so "Run date command" might be better. Let me go with that.
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Run date command chat.py:332
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me process this. The user asked to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt` using the shell tool. The response from the tool says "Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`" and "No output".
First, I need to determine if the command was successful. The command's purpose is to write the current date in YYYY-MM-DD format to a file called date-output.txt. If there's no output, it might mean that the command executed without errors, and the output was successfully redirected to the file. However, sometimes if there's an error, the command might fail silently or produce an error message.
But the user specified that if the command fails, I should respond with FAIL, and if successful, DONE. Since the tool's response doesn't show any error messages, it's possible that the command ran successfully. The absence of output could indicate that the command completed without issues, and the file was created with the date.
Alternatively, maybe the command didn't produce any output because the date command's output is correctly redirected. For example, if the command is correct and the file is written, there's no standard error output. So the shell tool's response might just be confirming the command was executed without errors.
Given the user's instructions, the correct response here would be DONE, assuming the command succeeded. There's no indication of an error in the tool's response, so I should follow the user's directive to reply with DONE upon successful completion.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[19:20:36] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[19:20:36] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me see. The user asked to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt` using the shell tool. I called the shell function with that command. The response from the tool said the command ran with no output. Since the command is straightforward and doesn't produce any output by default, the absence of output might just mean it worked silently. The user also mentioned that if there's an error, I should reply with FAIL, else DONE. Since there's no error message, and the command is simple, it's likely successful. So I should respond with DONE. The system message mentioned using the complete tool if done, but the user's last instruction was to answer only with DONE or FAIL. So I'll stick with DONE.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[19:20:40] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[19:20:40] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me see. The user initially asked to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt` using the shell tool. I called the shell function with that command. The response indicated that the command ran without output, and the user then replied with "DONE".
But then the system message mentioned that no tool call was detected in the last message, suggesting to use the `complete` tool if done. The user tried replying with "DONE" again, but the system is prompting again.
Wait, maybe the user is trying to signal completion. Since the command was executed successfully, and the user has already confirmed with "DONE", the next step should be to use the `complete` tool to end the session. The system is probably expecting that instead of just "DONE".
So, I should call the `complete` function now to properly finish the session. That makes sense because the user has already handled the command, and the system is reminding to use `complete` when done.
</think>
</think>
[19:20:45] INFO Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 confirmations. Exiting. complete.py:134
INFO Hook 'complete.auto_reply' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[19:20:45] Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 auto-reply confirmations. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-measured)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T19:20:45+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T19:19:58+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T19:20:45+00:00 exit_code=0