Case: 20260423T190703Z__gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de
PASS Trajectory: recovered | Invoked: yes | Match: 100%
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-warmup --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/workspace-warmup --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/qwen3:8b 'Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt. Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL. Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE. '
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-measured --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/workspace --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/qwen3:8b 'Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt. Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL. Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE. '
Consistency: diverged
Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt. Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL. Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
2026-04-23
2026-04-23
Expected and observed match.
No structured session transcript found.
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T19:17:31+00:00
[19:17:32] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/runtime/gptme/warmup/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[19:17:32] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/qwen3:8b
[19:17:33] Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/runtime/gptme/warmup/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-warmup
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/workspace-warmup
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt.
Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht.
Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL.
Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, I need to use the shell tool to execute the command 'date +%F > date-output.txt'. Let me make sure I understand what this command does. The 'date' command with the format '%F' will output the current date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Redirecting that output to 'date-output.txt' should save the date into a file named date-output.txt.
First, I should check if the command is correct. The syntax for redirecting output in shell is using '>', which overwrites the file if it exists. The command itself seems straightforward. There's no obvious error here.
Next, I need to use the shell function provided. The user specified to use the shell tool and execute exactly this command. They also mentioned not to repeat the process if there's an error and to respond with FAIL if it fails, otherwise DONE.
Since the command is simple and there's no indication of permissions issues or missing tools (like 'date' is a standard command), I expect it to work. Therefore, I'll proceed to call the shell function with this command. If it runs successfully, the response should be 'DONE'; if not, 'FAIL'. But given the command's simplicity, I'm confident it will succeed.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_fpeg69js): {"command":"date +%F \u003e date-output.txt"}
Preview
date +%F > date-output.txt
System:
Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`
No output
[19:17:44] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant: Thinking...
[19:18:01] INFO Reasoning content: Okay, the user provided a command to run in the shell, specifically using the date command to output the current date in the format YYYY-MM-DD into a file called date-output.txt. The instructions mention to repeat the llm_openai.py:321
process if there's an error, but if the command fails, respond with FAIL.
So the main topic here is about executing a shell command related to date formatting and file output. The examples given in the rules are things like "Python debugging help" or "CSS layout issue", which are concise and capture the main
action.
The user's command is straightforward: using the date command with a specific format and redirecting the output to a file. The key elements here are the shell command, date formatting, and file output.
Possible titles could be "Shell date command" or "Date output file". But the examples have titles like "Website creation task" which is 3 words. The user's example titles are 2-4 words.
The command involves using the shell tool, so "Shell date command" is 3 words. Alternatively, "Date output file" is 2 words. But maybe combining the action and the task. The user's instruction is to run the command, so maybe "Run date
command" or "Execute date command".
Wait, the user's example for a similar task was "API integration guide" which is 3 words. The main action here is executing the command, so "Shell command run" or "Date command output".
But the user's example for a command might be more like "Shell command task" or "Date output task". However, the examples given are more about the task or problem, like "Python debugging help" which is about solving a problem.
In this case, the user is asking to run a specific command, so the title should reflect that. The main elements are the shell tool, the date command, and the output to a file. But the title needs to be concise.
Maybe "Shell date output" or "Date command file". Alternatively, "Execute date command" is 3 words. But the user's examples have titles that are more about the task or problem.
Looking back, the user's examples include "Website creation task" which is a task. So maybe "Shell command task" or "Date output task". But the command is specific.
Alternatively, "Date output file" is 2 words, which is concise. But maybe "Shell date command" is better as it includes the tool and the action.
Wait, the user's example for a similar scenario might be "Shell command run" but that's 3 words. The key is to capture the main topic. The main topic here is executing the date command in the shell. So "Shell date command" is 3 words,
which fits the 2-4 word rule.
Alternatively, "Date output task" could work. But the user's example for a task is "Website creation task". So maybe "Shell command task" is more aligned with that.
But the user's command is specific, so maybe "Shell date command" is better. Let me check the examples again. The examples include "Python debugging help" which is about a problem, "CSS layout issue" which is a problem, "API integration
guide" which is a task.
In this case, the user is asking to run a specific command, so the title should reflect that action. "Shell date command" captures the tool (shell) and the action (date command). That's 3 words, which is within the limit.
Alternatively, "Date command output" could be another option, but "Shell date command" seems more precise. So I'll go with that.
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell date command chat.py:332
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me process what just happened. The user asked to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt` using the shell tool. I called the shell function with that command. The response from the tool was "Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`" and "No output".
Hmm, the command is supposed to write the current date in YYYY-MM-DD format to a file called date-output.txt. If there's no output, that might mean the command executed successfully without any errors, but the output was redirected to the file instead of the terminal. Alternatively, there could be an error, but the tool didn't capture it properly.
Wait, the user mentioned that if the command fails, I should respond with FAIL, else DONE. Since the tool's response didn't show any error messages, maybe the command ran successfully. The absence of output could just mean that the command completed without errors, and the output was successfully written to the file.
I should check if the file was created. But since I can't access the filesystem here, I have to rely on the tool's response. The user's instruction was to not repeat the process on failure, so if there's no error, the answer should be DONE. Therefore, I'll respond with DONE.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[19:18:08] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[19:18:08] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me see. The user asked to use the shell tool to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt` and not repeat the process if there's an error. They also specified to respond with FAIL if it fails, else DONE.
First, I called the shell tool with that command. The response from the tool was "Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`[/dim]n[/dim]nNo output". Since there's no error mentioned, the command probably executed successfully. The user expects a DONE response on success.
But wait, the system message says no tool call was detected. Maybe the previous response didn't use the tool correctly. Oh, right, the user wants me to use the shell tool and then respond with DONE or FAIL. Since the command ran without errors, I should confirm it's done. However, the system is prompting me to use the complete tool if I'm done. So, I should call complete to end the session properly. That makes sense because the task is completed, and the user wants the session to end. So the correct step now is to use the complete tool.
</think>
</think>
[19:18:14] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[19:18:14] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me see. The user initially asked to use the shell tool to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt`. I called the shell function with that command. The response from the tool indicated that the command ran without output, which is expected because the command is redirecting the output to a file. Since there was no error mentioned, the user then replied with "DONE".
But then the system message said there was no tool call in the last message, suggesting that maybe the session should end. The user might be indicating that they're done and want to finish the session. Since the original task was to execute the command and the command succeeded, there's no further action needed. The correct step here is to use the `complete` tool to signal the end of the session. I should make sure that I'm not missing any other steps, but since the command was successful and the user hasn't asked for anything else, ending the session is appropriate.
</think>
</think>
[19:18:19] INFO Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 confirmations. Exiting. complete.py:134
INFO Hook 'complete.auto_reply' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[19:18:19] Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 auto-reply confirmations. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-warmup)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T19:18:20+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T19:17:31+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T19:18:20+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T19:18:20+00:00
[19:18:21] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/runtime/gptme/measured/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[19:18:21] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/qwen3:8b
Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/runtime/gptme/measured/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-measured
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T190703Z/cases/gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de/workspace
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: date +%F > date-output.txt.
Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht.
Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL.
Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, the user wants me to use the shell tool to run the command 'date +%F > date-output.txt'. Let me make sure I understand what this command does. The 'date' command with the format +%F will output the current date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Then, redirecting that output to a file named date-output.txt using the '>' operator.
First, I need to check if the shell tool is available. According to the tools provided, the shell function is there, and it can execute commands. The user also mentioned not to repeat the process if there's an error, so I should execute this command once.
I should construct the tool call with the shell function and the command as an argument. The command is straightforward, so there's no need for background jobs here since it's a simple command that won't run indefinitely.
I need to ensure that the arguments are correctly formatted as a JSON object with the command key. The command value should be the exact string 'date +%F > date-output.txt'.
Once the command is executed, if it succeeds, the shell tool will return the output, and I should respond with 'DONE'. If there's an error, like permission issues or the command not being recognized, I should respond with 'FAIL'. But since the command is standard and the user didn't mention any specific issues, I'll proceed to execute it.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_yx23w8qj): {"command":"date +%F \u003e date-output.txt"}
Preview
date +%F > date-output.txt
System:
Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`
No output
Assistant: Thinking...
[19:18:33] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me process what just happened. The user asked to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt` using the shell tool. I called the shell function with that command. The response from the tool was "Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`[/dim]nNo output".
Hmm, the command itself is straightforward. The `date` command with the +%F format should output the current date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Redirecting that output to a file named date-output.txt. If there's no error, the file should be created with the current date.
But the user mentioned that if the command fails, I should respond with FAIL, and if successful, respond with DONE. Since the tool's response says "No output", that might mean the command executed without errors, but there's no output to show. Alternatively, maybe the command ran successfully and the output was redirected to the file, so there's no terminal output.
Wait, in shell commands, if you redirect output to a file, the terminal doesn't show the output unless there's an error. So if the command ran successfully, the terminal would have no output, and the file would contain the date. Therefore, the correct response here is DONE because the command executed without errors, and the output was successfully written to the file. The user didn't mention any errors, so I should confirm success.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[19:18:39] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[19:18:39] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
[19:18:54] INFO Reasoning content: Okay, the user provided a command to run in the shell, specifically using the date command to output the current date in the format YYYY-MM-DD into a file called date-output.txt. The instructions mention to repeat the llm_openai.py:321
process if there's an error, but if the command fails, respond with FAIL.
So the main topic here is about executing a shell command related to date formatting and file output. The examples given in the rules are things like "Python debugging help" or "CSS layout issue", which are concise and capture the main
action.
I need to create a title that's 2-4 words. Let's break down the command: it's about using the shell, running a date command, and redirecting output to a file. The key elements are the shell tool, date command, and file output.
Possible titles could be "Shell Date Command" or "Date Output File". But maybe combining the action and the task. The user is asking to run the command, so maybe "Run Date Command" or "Shell Date Output". Wait, the example "Website
creation task" is 3 words. So maybe "Shell Date Output" is 3 words. Alternatively, "Date Command Shell" but that's not as clear.
Another angle: the user is instructing to execute the command, so "Execute Date Command" is 3 words. But maybe the main focus is on the command itself. The command is about getting the date and saving it to a file. So "Date Output File"
could work. But the user is using the shell tool, so maybe "Shell Date Output" is better.
Alternatively, since the command is about redirecting output, maybe "Redirect Date Output" but that's 3 words. The user's instruction is to run the command, so "Run Date Command" is straightforward. But the example given for a similar
task was "Website creation task", which is more about the task.
Wait, the user's message is about executing a specific shell command. The main topic is the execution of that command. So maybe "Shell Command Execution" but that's 3 words. However, the example "Python debugging help" is more about the
problem.
Alternatively, since the command is about date and output, maybe "Date Output Command" but that's 3 words. The key is to capture the main topic. The user is asking to run the command, so the title should reflect that action.
Looking back at the examples, "Python debugging help" is about a problem, "Website creation task" is a task. So maybe "Shell Date Command" is the best fit here. It's 3 words, captures the shell tool and the date command. Alternatively,
"Date Command Shell" but that's less common.
Another thought: the command is about redirecting output to a file, so maybe "Redirect Date Output" but that's 3 words. However, the user's main action is to run the command, so "Run Date Command" is more direct.
But the user's instruction is to use the shell tool and run the command. So "Shell Date Command" is concise and captures the main topic. That's 3 words, which fits the 2-4 word rule. I think that's the best option.
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell Date Command chat.py:332
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me see. The user asked to use the shell tool to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt` and then repeat the process if there's an error. But if it fails, respond with FAIL, and if successful, with DONE.
First, I called the shell tool with that command. The response from the tool was "Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`[/dim]n[/dim]nNo output". So the command ran without any errors. Since there's no error, according to the user's instructions, I should respond with DONE.
Wait, but the system message said that if there's no tool call in the last message, maybe the user meant to finish. But in this case, the command was executed successfully, so the correct response is DONE. The system message might be a reminder to use the complete tool if done. However, the user's original instruction was to just output DONE upon success. So I should stick with that. No need to call complete here because the task is done. Just respond with DONE.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[19:19:00] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[19:19:00] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
Okay, let me see. The user initially asked to use the shell tool to run the command `date +%F > date-output.txt`. I called the shell function with that command. The response indicated the command ran without output, so I replied with "DONE". The user then mentioned not detecting a tool call and asked if I meant to finish, suggesting using the `complete` tool.
Wait, the user's last message is a system message saying that no tool call was detected. They're reminding me to use the `complete` tool if I'm done. Since the original command was successful, and there's no further action needed, I should signal completion. The user probably wants me to end the session properly. So, I should call the `complete` tool now to indicate the task is done and end the session.
</think>
</think>
[19:19:05] INFO Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 confirmations. Exiting. complete.py:134
INFO Hook 'complete.auto_reply' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[19:19:05] Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 auto-reply confirmations. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_qwen3_8b__ollama__tool__shell_date_de-measured)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T19:19:05+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T19:18:20+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T19:19:05+00:00 exit_code=0