Case: 20260423T183136Z__gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru
PASS Trajectory: recovered | Invoked: yes | Match: 100%
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru-warmup --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T183136Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru/workspace-warmup --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/gemma4:e4b 'Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('"'"'python-output.txt'"'"').write_text('"'"'PYTHON_OK\\n'"'"')".
Не повторяй попытку при ошибке.
Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL.
Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
'gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru-measured --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T183136Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru/workspace --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/gemma4:e4b 'Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('"'"'python-output.txt'"'"').write_text('"'"'PYTHON_OK\\n'"'"')".
Не повторяй попытку при ошибке.
Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL.
Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
'Consistency: diverged
Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')".
Не повторяй попытку при ошибке.
Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL.
Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
PYTHON_OK
PYTHON_OK
Expected and observed match.
No structured session transcript found.
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:34:50+00:00
[18:34:52] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T183136Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru/runtime/gptme/warmup/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[18:34:52] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/gemma4:e4b
Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T183136Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru/runtime/gptme/warmup/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru-warmup
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T183136Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru/workspace-warmup
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')".
Не повторяй попытку при ошибке.
Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL.
Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to execute a specific shell command: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK[/dim][/dim]n')"`.
I must use the `shell` tool.
The response format is strict:
1. If the command fails, I must reply *only* with "FAIL".
2. If the command succeeds, I must reply *only* with "DONE".
I will use the `shell` tool to execute the command.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_bfyw20wt): {"command":"python3 -c \"from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\\\n')\""}
Preview
python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"
System:
Ran command: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"`
No output
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:35:06] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
[18:35:07] INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
DONE
[18:35:09] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:35:09] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user provided a response that seems to be a system message indicating no tool call was detected in the last message and suggesting I use `complete` if I am finished.
In the previous turn, I executed the command using `shell` and then provided the final required output ("DONE"). The system message is likely a prompt for me to acknowledge the completion of the task.
Since I have successfully executed the command and provided the required output ("DONE"), the task is complete. I should now use the `complete` tool.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_0bn54fh0): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[18:35:16] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[18:35:16] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru-warmup)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:35:16+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:34:50+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:35:16+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:35:16+00:00
[18:35:18] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T183136Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru/runtime/gptme/measured/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[18:35:18] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
[18:35:19] Using model: local/gemma4:e4b
Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T183136Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru/runtime/gptme/measured/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru-measured
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T183136Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru/workspace
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')".
Не повторяй попытку при ошибке.
Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL.
Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to execute a specific shell command: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK[/dim][/dim]n')"`.
I must use the `shell` tool.
The instructions specify strict output requirements:
1. If the command fails, I must respond *only* with "FAIL".
2. If the command succeeds, I must respond *only* with "DONE".
3. I must not repeat attempts upon failure.
I will use the `shell` tool to execute the command.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_79p7h0lu): {"command":"python3 -c \"from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\\\n')\""}
Preview
python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"
System:
Ran command: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"`
No output
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:35:33] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
[18:35:34] INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
DONE
[18:35:36] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:35:36] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user provided a response that seems to be a system message or a prompt for me to act on the previous interaction.
In the previous turn, I executed the command using `shell` and received a successful output (no error, just confirmation of execution).
The user's instructions were:
1. Execute the command: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK[/dim][/dim]n')"`
2. If successful, respond *only* with "DONE".
3. If failed, respond *only* with "FAIL".
I correctly executed the command and responded with "DONE".
The current message `<system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>` suggests that the system believes I should finish the session.
Since I have completed the task requested in the previous turn (executing the command and providing the required output), and the system is prompting me to finish, I should use the `complete` tool.
</thinking>
</thinking>
<|tool_call>call:complete{}<tool_call|>
</think>
</think>
[18:35:51] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:35:51] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user is repeating the system message: `<system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>`.
In the previous turn, I already called `complete{}`.
Since the system is repeatedly prompting me to finish, and I have already signaled completion, I should assume the task is finished and acknowledge the system's prompt by ensuring the final state is complete. I have already used the `complete` tool. If the system is still prompting, I will assume the previous `complete` call was sufficient and there is no further action required from my side, other than letting the session conclude.
However, since I am in a non-interactive mode and the system is prompting me, I must ensure I don't generate unnecessary output. I have already signaled completion. I will not take any further action as the task is complete.
</think>
</think>
[18:36:04] INFO Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 confirmations. Exiting. complete.py:134
INFO Hook 'complete.auto_reply' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[18:36:04] Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 auto-reply confirmations. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_gemma4_e4b__ollama__tool__python_file_ru-measured)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:36:04+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:35:16+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:36:04+00:00 exit_code=0