Case: 20260423T182304Z__gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru
PASS Trajectory: recovered | Invoked: yes | Match: 100%
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-warmup --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/workspace-warmup --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/gemma4:e2b 'Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt. Не повторяй попытку при ошибке. Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL. Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE. '
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-measured --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/workspace --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/gemma4:e2b 'Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt. Не повторяй попытку при ошибке. Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL. Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE. '
Consistency: diverged
Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt. Не повторяй попытку при ошибке. Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL. Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
2026-04-23
2026-04-23
Expected and observed match.
No structured session transcript found.
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:27:57+00:00
[18:27:59] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/runtime/gptme/warmup/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[18:27:59] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/gemma4:e2b
[18:28:00] Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/runtime/gptme/warmup/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-warmup
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/workspace-warmup
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt.
Не повторяй попытку при ошибке.
Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL.
Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to execute a specific shell command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`.
I need to use the `shell` tool for this execution.
The instructions specify the exact response format:
- If the command succeeds, respond with `DONE`.
- If the command fails, respond with `FAIL`.
I must not repeat attempts if there is an error.
Plan:
1. Call the `shell` tool with the command `date +%F > date-output.txt`.
2. Analyze the output to determine success or failure and respond accordingly.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_mi5hdeys): {"command":"date +%F \u003e date-output.txt"}
Preview
date +%F > date-output.txt
System:
Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`
No output
[18:28:08] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:28:14] INFO Reasoning content: Thinking Process: llm_openai.py:321
1. **Analyze the Request:** The user provided a conversation snippet and asked for a concise, 2-4 word title capturing the main topic.
2. **Analyze the Conversation Content:**
* User instruction: "Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt." (Use the shell tool. Execute exactly this command: date +%F > date-output.txt.)
* Error handling instructions: "Не повторяй попытку при ошибке. Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL. Если команда завершится успешно, ответ..." (Do not retry on error. If the command fails, reply only FAIL. If the
command succeeds, reply...)
* The core topic is executing a command via a shell tool and handling its success/failure.
3. **Determine the Main Topic:** Shell command execution and error handling.
4. **Generate Title Options (2-4 words):**
* Shell command execution
* Command execution rules
* Shell tool usage
* Command execution task
5. **Select the Best/Most Concise Title:** "Shell command execution" or something similar.
6. **Final Output Generation:** (Ensure only the title is outputted.)
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
DONE
INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:28:14] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user provided a message indicating that no tool call was detected in the last message and suggested using the `complete` tool.
This is a system prompt response, likely indicating the end of an autonomous session, or perhaps a misunderstanding of the previous interaction.
Since the previous request was fulfilled and the session context seems to be concluding, I should use the `complete` tool to signal the end of the session, as per the instructions for that tool.
</thinking>
</thinking>
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_xnlajoqo): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[18:28:17] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[18:28:17] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-warmup)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:28:18+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:27:57+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:28:18+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:28:18+00:00
[18:28:20] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/runtime/gptme/measured/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[18:28:20] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/gemma4:e2b
Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/runtime/gptme/measured/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-measured
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru/workspace
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt.
Не повторяй попытку при ошибке.
Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL.
Если команда завершится успешно, ответь только DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to execute a specific shell command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`.
I need to use the `shell` tool for this execution.
The instructions specify the exact response format:
- If the command succeeds, respond with `DONE`.
- If the command fails, respond with `FAIL`.
I must not repeat attempts if there is an error.
Plan:
1. Call the `shell` tool with the command `date +%F > date-output.txt`.
2. Analyze the output to determine success or failure and respond accordingly.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_03is73ay): {"command":"date +%F \u003e date-output.txt"}
Preview
date +%F > date-output.txt
System:
Ran command: `date +%F > date-output.txt`
No output
[18:28:28] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:28:35] INFO Reasoning content: Thinking Process: llm_openai.py:321
1. **Analyze the Request:** The user provided a conversation snippet and asked for a concise, 2-4 word title capturing the main topic.
2. **Analyze the Conversation Content:**
* User instruction: "Используй shell tool. Выполни ровно эту команду: date +%F > date-output.txt." (Use the shell tool. Execute exactly this command: date +%F > date-output.txt.)
* Error handling instructions: "Не повторяй попытку при ошибке. Если команда завершится ошибкой, ответь только FAIL. Если команда завершится успешно, ответ..." (Do not retry on error. If the command fails, reply only FAIL. If the
command succeeds, reply...)
* The core topic is executing a command via a shell tool and handling its success/failure.
3. **Determine the Main Topic:** Shell command execution and error handling.
4. **Generate Title Options (2-4 words):**
* Shell command execution
* Command execution rules
* Shell tool usage
* Command execution task
5. **Select the Best/Most Concise Title:** "Shell command execution" or something similar.
6. **Final Output Generation:** (Ensure only the title is outputted.)
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
DONE
INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:28:35] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user provided a message indicating that no tool call was detected in the last message and suggested using the `complete` tool.
This is a system prompt response, likely indicating the end of an autonomous session, or perhaps a misunderstanding of the previous interaction.
Since the previous request was fulfilled and the session context seems to be concluding, I should use the `complete` tool to signal the end of the session, as per the instructions for that tool.
</thinking>
</thinking>
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_lk7fup64): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[18:28:38] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[18:28:38] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__shell_date_ru-measured)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:28:38+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:28:18+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:28:38+00:00 exit_code=0