Case: 20260423T182304Z__gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file
PASS Trajectory: recovered | Invoked: yes | Match: 100%
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file-warmup --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file/workspace-warmup --tools save --tool-format tool -m local/gemma4:e2b 'Use the save tool to create saved-by-gptme.txt in the current workspace with exactly this content and nothing else: TOOL_SAVE_OK. Do not retry on error. If the save fails, reply only with FAIL. If the save succeeds, reply only with DONE. '
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file-measured --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file/workspace --tools save --tool-format tool -m local/gemma4:e2b 'Use the save tool to create saved-by-gptme.txt in the current workspace with exactly this content and nothing else: TOOL_SAVE_OK. Do not retry on error. If the save fails, reply only with FAIL. If the save succeeds, reply only with DONE. '
Consistency: diverged
Use the save tool to create saved-by-gptme.txt in the current workspace with exactly this content and nothing else: TOOL_SAVE_OK. Do not retry on error. If the save fails, reply only with FAIL. If the save succeeds, reply only with DONE.
TOOL_SAVE_OK
TOOL_SAVE_OK
Expected and observed match.
No structured session transcript found.
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:26:27+00:00
[18:26:30] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file/runtime/gptme/warmup/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[18:26:30] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/gemma4:e2b
[18:26:31] Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file/runtime/gptme/warmup/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file-warmup
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file/workspace-warmup
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Use the save tool to create saved-by-gptme.txt in the current workspace with exactly this content and nothing else: TOOL_SAVE_OK.
Do not retry on error.
If the save fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the save succeeds, reply only with DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to use the `save` tool to create a file named `saved-by-gptme.txt` with the exact content `TOOL_SAVE_OK`.
I need to call the `save` tool with the specified path and content.
If the save succeeds, I must reply only with `DONE`.
If the save fails, I must reply only with `FAIL`.
I must not retry on error.
</think>
</think>
@save(call_xg4kr4nf): {"content":"TOOL_SAVE_OK","path":"saved-by-gptme.txt"}
Preview
TOOL_SAVE_OK
System: ✅ Saved to saved-by-gptme.txt
[18:26:37] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:26:42] INFO Reasoning content: Thinking Process: llm_openai.py:321
1. **Analyze the Request:** The user provided a short interaction where the user is instructing the assistant to use a tool (`save`) to create a specific file (`saved-by-gptme.txt`) with specific content (`TOOL_SAVE_OK`).
2. **Determine the Core Topic:** The conversation is about executing a file saving command or tool usage.
3. **Goal:** Create a concise, 2-4 word title for this action.
4. **Draft Titles:**
* Saving file content
* Tool save instruction
* File saving task
* Executing save command
5. **Select the Best/Most Concise Title:** "File saving task" or "Tool save instruction" accurately captures the intent. "Save file content" is also good. I will aim for the most direct description of the action.
6. **Final Selection Check:** Meets the 2-4 word limit. Captures the main topic. (e.g., "File saving task")
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Save file content chat.py:332
Assistant:
DONE
INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:26:42] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user provided a system message indicating that no tool call was detected in the last message and suggesting I might want to use the `complete` tool to end the session.
However, the previous turn was a direct instruction to save a file, and I already executed that instruction and received a success response (`Saved to saved-by-gptme.txt`).
Since there is no new task or explicit request following the previous successful operation, and the system message is a general prompt about finishing, I should check if the overall task is complete. The previous instruction was: "Use the save tool to create saved-by-gptme.txt in the current workspace with exactly this content and nothing else: TOOL_SAVE_OK. Do not retry on error. If the save fails, reply only with FAIL. If the save succeeds, reply only with DONE."
I have already executed this instruction and replied with `DONE`.
Since the user is now prompting me again, I should assume the session is complete unless a new instruction is provided. I will use the `complete` tool to signal the end of the session as suggested by the system message.
</thinking
<|tool_call>call:complete{}<tool_call|>
</think>
</think>
[18:26:48] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:26:48] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user has sent the same system message again, prompting me to use the `complete` tool to finish the session because no tool call was detected.
This is a repetition of the previous state where I already called `complete` after successfully fulfilling the user's initial request.
Since the instruction is to finish, and I have already signaled completion, I should acknowledge this and ensure the session is truly ended. I will call `complete` again, as per the system's suggestion.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_9syjauo6): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[18:26:51] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[18:26:51] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file-warmup)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:26:51+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:26:27+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:26:51+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:26:51+00:00
[18:26:53] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file/runtime/gptme/measured/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[18:26:53] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/gemma4:e2b
Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file/runtime/gptme/measured/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file-measured
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file/workspace
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Use the save tool to create saved-by-gptme.txt in the current workspace with exactly this content and nothing else: TOOL_SAVE_OK.
Do not retry on error.
If the save fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the save succeeds, reply only with DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to use the `save` tool to create a file named `saved-by-gptme.txt` with the exact content `TOOL_SAVE_OK`.
I need to call the `save` tool with the specified path and content.
If the save succeeds, I must reply only with `DONE`.
If the save fails, I must reply only with `FAIL`.
I must not retry on error.
</think>
</think>
@save(call_oswf9isj): {"content":"TOOL_SAVE_OK","path":"saved-by-gptme.txt"}
Preview
TOOL_SAVE_OK
System: ✅ Saved to saved-by-gptme.txt
[18:26:59] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
DONE
[18:27:00] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:27:00] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:27:05] INFO Reasoning content: Thinking Process: llm_openai.py:321
1. **Analyze the Request:** The user provided a short interaction where the user is instructing the assistant to use a tool (`save`) to create a specific file (`saved-by-gptme.txt`) with specific content (`TOOL_SAVE_OK`).
2. **Determine the Core Topic:** The conversation is about executing a file saving command or tool usage.
3. **Goal:** Create a concise, 2-4 word title for this action.
4. **Draft Titles:**
* Saving file content
* Tool save instruction
* File saving task
* Executing save command
5. **Select the Best/Most Concise Title:** "File saving task" or "Tool save instruction" accurately captures the intent. "Save file content" is also good. I will aim for the most direct description of the action.
6. **Final Selection Check:** Meets the 2-4 word limit. Captures the main topic. (e.g., "File saving task")
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Save file content chat.py:332
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user has provided a system message indicating that no tool call was detected in the last message and suggesting I might want to use the `complete` tool to end the session.
Looking back at the previous turn, I successfully executed the user's request to save a file and responded with `DONE`.
The current instruction is a system prompt, not a direct request for a task. Since the previous task is complete and there is no new instruction, I should consider if the session should be ended. The system message explicitly suggests using the `complete` tool if I have finished my work.
Since the previous explicit task is finished, I will use the `complete` tool to signal the end of the session, as suggested by the system prompt.
</thinking
<|tool_call>call:complete{}<tool_call|>
</think>
</think>
[18:27:08] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:27:08] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user has sent the same system message again, which suggests I should use the `complete` tool to end the session because no tool call was detected in the last message.
This is a repetition of the previous instruction. I have already executed the `complete` tool in the previous turn.
Since the user is prompting me again, I should assume they are waiting for the session to conclude or that they are testing the flow. As I have no further task, and the previous action was to complete the session, I will re-evaluate.
However, the instruction is very specific: "No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session."
Since I have already called `complete` in the previous turn, and there is no new task, I should not repeat the call unless the context implies a fresh start or an error occurred. Given the context of a non-interactive mode where I should act based on the prompt, and the prompt is a system message, I will assume the previous action was sufficient, or I will re-execute it if the system insists.
Since the system message is identical, I will execute the action again to comply with the instruction, assuming the session is still open and needs explicit closure.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_4a3jhn6z): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[18:27:15] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[18:27:15] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__save_file-measured)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:27:15+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:26:51+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:27:15+00:00 exit_code=0