Case: 20260423T182304Z__gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de
PASS Trajectory: recovered | Invoked: yes | Match: 100%
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de-warmup --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de/workspace-warmup --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/gemma4:e2b 'Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('"'"'python-output.txt'"'"').write_text('"'"'PYTHON_OK\\n'"'"')".
Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht.
Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL.
Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
'gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de-measured --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de/workspace --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/gemma4:e2b 'Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('"'"'python-output.txt'"'"').write_text('"'"'PYTHON_OK\\n'"'"')".
Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht.
Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL.
Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
'Consistency: diverged
Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')".
Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht.
Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL.
Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
PYTHON_OK
PYTHON_OK
Expected and observed match.
No structured session transcript found.
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:24:58+00:00
[18:24:59] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de/runtime/gptme/warmup/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[18:24:59] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/gemma4:e2b
[18:25:00] Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de/runtime/gptme/warmup/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de-warmup
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de/workspace-warmup
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')".
Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht.
Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL.
Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to execute a specific shell command using the `shell` tool.
The command is: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK[/dim][/dim]n')"`
I need to execute this command and respond only with "DONE" if successful, or "FAIL" if it fails.
Step 1: Call the `shell` tool with the provided command.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_3zirhlbz): {"command":"python3 -c \"from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\\\n')\""}
Preview
python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"
System:
Ran command: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"`
No output
[18:25:07] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:25:15] INFO Reasoning content: Thinking Process: llm_openai.py:321
1. **Analyze the Request:** The user wants a concise, 2-4 word title for the provided conversation.
2. **Analyze the Conversation Content:**
* User input: "Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')". Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wen..." (Use the
Shell Tool. Execute exactly this command: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')". Do not repeat the process on error. Who...)
* Assistant response: `<think> The user wants me to execute a specific shell command using the shell tool. The command is: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')" I ne...`
3. **Identify the Main Topic:** The conversation is about executing a specific command (shell command) and using a shell tool. It is a technical instruction/execution task.
4. **Draft Potential Titles (Focusing on conciseness):**
* Shell command execution
* Executing Python command
* Shell tool usage
* Running shell command
5. **Select the Best Title (2-4 words):** "Shell command execution" or "Shell tool usage" are accurate and concise. "Shell command" is very direct.
6. **Final Output Generation:** (Ensure only the title is outputted.)
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
DONE
[18:25:16] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:25:16] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user provided a message indicating that no tool call was detected in the last message and suggested using the `complete` tool.
This usually happens when the previous turn was a direct response or the session is expected to end.
Reviewing the previous interaction:
1. User asked me to execute a shell command and respond with "DONE" or "FAIL".
2. I executed the command and received an output that seemed to indicate success (though the actual output was empty, the instruction was to respond with DONE or FAIL based on success/failure).
3. I responded with "DONE".
The current message from the system seems to be a generic prompt, perhaps triggered because the previous turn ended abruptly or the system is waiting for a final action.
Since the previous task was completed, and there are no further instructions, I should signal the completion of the session.
</thinking>
</thinking>
<|tool_call>call:complete{}<tool_call|>
</think>
</think>
[18:25:20] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:25:20] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user is repeating the system prompt suggesting that I should use the `complete` tool to end the session because no tool call was detected.
This is a continuation of the previous interaction where I already called `complete`. I should acknowledge this and confirm that the session is finished, as per the instructions.
</think>
</think>
DONE
[18:25:22] INFO Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 confirmations. Exiting. complete.py:134
INFO Hook 'complete.auto_reply' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[18:25:22] Autonomous mode: No tools used after 2 auto-reply confirmations. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de-warmup)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:25:22+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:24:58+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:25:22+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:25:22+00:00
[18:25:24] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de/runtime/gptme/measured/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[18:25:24] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
[18:25:25] Using model: local/gemma4:e2b
Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de/runtime/gptme/measured/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de-measured
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de/workspace
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')".
Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht.
Wenn der Befehl fehlschlaegt, antworte nur mit FAIL.
Wenn der Befehl erfolgreich ist, antworte nur mit DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to execute a specific shell command using the `shell` tool.
The command is: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK[/dim][/dim]n')"`
I need to execute this command and respond only with "DONE" if successful, or "FAIL" if it fails.
Step 1: Call the `shell` tool with the provided command.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_eueoqy22): {"command":"python3 -c \"from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\\\n')\""}
Preview
python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"
System:
Ran command: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"`
No output
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:25:33] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
Assistant:
DONE
[18:25:34] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:25:34] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:25:41] INFO Reasoning content: Thinking Process: llm_openai.py:321
1. **Analyze the Request:** The user wants a concise, 2-4 word title for the provided conversation.
2. **Analyze the Conversation Content:**
* User input: "Verwende das Shell-Tool. Fuehre genau diesen Befehl aus: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')". Wiederhole den Vorgang bei einem Fehler nicht. Wen..." (Use the
Shell Tool. Execute exactly this command: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')". Do not repeat the process on error. Who...)
* Assistant response: `<think> The user wants me to execute a specific shell command using the shell tool. The command is: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')" I ne...`
3. **Identify the Main Topic:** The conversation is about executing a specific command (shell command) and using a shell tool. It is a technical instruction/execution task.
4. **Draft Potential Titles (Focusing on conciseness):**
* Shell command execution
* Executing Python command
* Shell tool usage
* Running shell command
5. **Select the Best Title (2-4 words):** "Shell command execution" or "Shell tool usage" are accurate and concise. "Shell command" is very direct.
6. **Final Output Generation:** (Ensure only the title is outputted.)
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user provided a message indicating that no tool call was detected in the last message and suggested using the `complete` tool.
However, the previous turn was a direct instruction to execute a shell command, and I already executed it and responded with "DONE".
Since there is no new task or instruction, and the previous task was completed, I should check if the session should be ended. The previous instruction was to execute a command and report success/failure. I have already done that.
Since the user is prompting me again without a new task, I should assume the session is complete unless there is an explicit instruction to continue. I will use the `complete` tool to signal the end of the session.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_s0b6ph5k): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[18:25:44] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[18:25:44] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file_de-measured)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:25:45+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:25:22+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:25:45+00:00 exit_code=0