Case: 20260423T182304Z__gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file
PASS Trajectory: recovered | Invoked: yes | Match: 100%
gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file-warmup --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file/workspace-warmup --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/gemma4:e2b 'Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('"'"'python-output.txt'"'"').write_text('"'"'PYTHON_OK\\n'"'"')".
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
'gptme --non-interactive --no-confirm --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file-measured --system short --workspace /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file/workspace --tools shell --tool-format tool -m local/gemma4:e2b 'Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('"'"'python-output.txt'"'"').write_text('"'"'PYTHON_OK\\n'"'"')".
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
'Consistency: diverged
Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')".
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
PYTHON_OK
PYTHON_OK
Expected and observed match.
No structured session transcript found.
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:24:11+00:00
[18:24:12] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file/runtime/gptme/warmup/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[18:24:12] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/gemma4:e2b
[18:24:13] Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file/runtime/gptme/warmup/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file-warmup
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file/workspace-warmup
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')".
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to execute a specific shell command using the `shell` tool.
The command is: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK[/dim][/dim]n')"`
I need to execute this command and reply only with "DONE" if it succeeds, or "FAIL" if it fails.
Step 1: Call the `shell` tool with the provided command.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_pwovx4v2): {"command":"python3 -c \"from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\\\n')\""}
Preview
python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"
System:
Ran command: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"`
No output
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:24:21] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
[18:24:27] INFO Reasoning content: Thinking Process: llm_openai.py:321
1. **Analyze the Request:** The goal is to create a concise, 2-4 word title for the provided conversation.
2. **Analyze the Conversation Content:**
* User instruction: "Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')'. Do not retry on error. If the command fails, reply only with ..."
* Assistant response: `<think> The user wants me to execute a specific shell command... I ne...` (The assistant is processing the instruction/command execution.)
3. **Identify the Main Topic:** The conversation is about executing a specific command/shell instruction.
4. **Draft Potential Titles (Focusing on conciseness):**
* Shell command execution
* Running python command
* Executing shell command
* Command execution task
5. **Select the Best/Most Concise Title:** "Shell command execution" or something similar clearly captures the action.
6. **Final Check against Rules:**
* 2-4 words? Yes.
* Only the title? Yes.
* Captures the main topic? Yes.
7. **Output Generation.**
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
DONE
[18:24:28] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:24:28] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user provided a message indicating that no tool call was detected in the last message and suggested using the `complete` tool.
This usually happens when the previous turn was a direct response or the session is expected to end.
Looking back at the previous interaction:
1. User asked to run a specific shell command.
2. I executed the command and replied with "DONE".
The current message seems to be an internal system prompt or a follow-up from the environment, suggesting I should use `complete`. Since the task seems finished (the previous request was executed), I should use the `complete` tool to signal the end of the session.
</thinking><|tool_call>call:complete{}<tool_call|>
</think>
</think>
[18:24:31] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:24:31] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user is repeating the system prompt suggesting I use the `complete` tool because no tool call was detected in the last message. This implies the session should be ended.
I have already executed the necessary steps to fulfill the previous request and the subsequent system prompt. I should now call the `complete` tool to formally end the session.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_fqoyfvy2): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[18:24:34] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[18:24:34] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file-warmup)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:24:34+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:24:11+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:24:34+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:24:34+00:00
[18:24:36] Created config file at /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file/runtime/gptme/measured/home/.config/gptme/config.toml
[18:24:36] WARNING Skipping all confirmation prompts. cli.py:265
Using model: local/gemma4:e2b
[18:24:37] Using logdir: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file/runtime/gptme/measured/state/gptme-logs/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file-measured
Using workspace: /work/results/runs/20260423T182304Z/cases/gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file/workspace
Skipped 2 hidden system messages, show with --show-hidden
--- ^^^ past messages ^^^ ---
User:
Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')".
Do not retry on error.
If the command fails, reply only with FAIL.
If the command succeeds, reply only with DONE.
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user wants me to execute a specific shell command using the `shell` tool.
The command is: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK[/dim][/dim]n')"`
I need to execute this command and reply only with "DONE" if it succeeds, or "FAIL" if it fails.
Step 1: Call the `shell` tool with the provided command.
</think>
</think>
@shell(call_oganvdl2): {"command":"python3 -c \"from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\\\n')\""}
Preview
python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"
System:
Ran command: `python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')"`
No output
Assistant: Thinking...
[18:24:45] ERROR exception during auto-name auto_naming.py:100
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/util/auto_naming.py", line 97, in _generate_llm_name
summary_model_name = get_summary_model(current_model.provider)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/opt/venvs/gptme/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gptme/llm/models.py", line 576, in get_summary_model
raise ValueError(f"Provider {provider} did not have a summary model")
ValueError: Provider local did not have a summary model
[18:24:51] INFO Reasoning content: Thinking Process: llm_openai.py:321
1. **Analyze the Request:** The goal is to create a concise, 2-4 word title for the provided conversation.
2. **Analyze the Conversation Content:**
* User instruction: "Use the shell tool. Run exactly this command: python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; Path('python-output.txt').write_text('PYTHON_OK\\n')'. Do not retry on error. If the command fails, reply only with ..."
* Assistant response: `<think> The user wants me to execute a specific shell command... I ne...` (The assistant is processing the instruction/command execution.)
3. **Identify the Main Topic:** The conversation is about executing a specific command/shell instruction.
4. **Draft Potential Titles (Focusing on conciseness):**
* Shell command execution
* Running python command
* Executing shell command
* Command execution task
5. **Select the Best/Most Concise Title:** "Shell command execution" or something similar clearly captures the action.
6. **Final Check against Rules:**
* 2-4 words? Yes.
* Only the title? Yes.
* Captures the main topic? Yes.
7. **Output Generation.**
INFO Auto-generated conversation name: Shell command execution chat.py:332
Assistant:
DONE
INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:24:51] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user provided a message indicating that no tool call was detected in the last message and suggested using the `complete` tool.
This usually happens when the previous turn was a direct response or the session is expected to end.
Looking back at the previous interaction:
1. User asked to run a specific shell command.
2. I executed the command and replied with "DONE".
The current message seems to be an internal system prompt or a follow-up from the environment, suggesting I should use `complete`. Since the task seems finished (the previous request was executed), I should use the `complete` tool to signal the end of the session.
</thinking><|tool_call>call:complete{}<tool_call|>
</think>
</think>
[18:24:55] INFO Auto-reply: Assistant message had no tools. Asking for confirmation... complete.py:138
[18:24:55] [Loop control] <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are comp...
User: <system>No tool call detected in last message. Did you mean to finish? If so, make sure you are completely done and then use the `complete` tool to end the session.</system>
Assistant: Thinking...
Assistant:
<think>
<think>
The user is repeating the system prompt suggesting I use the `complete` tool because no tool call was detected in the last message. This implies the session should be ended.
I have already executed the necessary steps to fulfill the previous request and the subsequent system prompt. I should now call the `complete` tool to formally end the session.
</think>
</think>
@complete(call_zfqtm48j): {}
System: Task complete. Autonomous session finished.
[18:24:57] INFO Complete tool call detected, stopping session immediately complete.py:80
INFO Hook 'complete.complete' signaled session completion __init__.py:360
[18:24:57] Autonomous mode: Session completed via complete tool. Exiting.
Goodbye! (resume with: gptme --name gptme__local_gemma4_e2b__ollama__tool__python_file-measured)
[gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:24:57+00:00 exit_code=0
[gripprobe] process_started_at=2026-04-23T18:24:34+00:00 [gripprobe] process_finished_at=2026-04-23T18:24:57+00:00 exit_code=0